How Was Universe Created?
No less an authority than the brilliant Stephen Hawking once said that the universe “popped” up spontaneously from nothing. Hawking himself stated that this is not proven and added that it may take eternity to figure it out.
One of the pieces to the puzzle has been accepted by more and more people in the last few year: There may be a lot more intelligent life around us than we originally thought. This may not help us determine how the universe was created but it is a step in the right direction.
So, what is the answer? Did the universe just pop up from nothing? Is there enough evidence of intelligent life to go with theory that someone, somewhere made this all happen? Recent thinking among scientists shows that there may be so much intelligent life in our universe that it is our task, as intelligent beings, to create yet another universe.
One theory indicates that the dense core of matter that exploded in the Big Bang was and still is friendly to life. It is not, as some have theorized, a dying universe at all. At the core of this theory is the belief that the dense collection of material exploded “back then” with just enough force to allow life as we understand it to exist. The theory also puts a lot of weight on the existence of carbon as a key element in the sustenance of life.
As a parallel to this theory some scientists are proposing two ideas: either the so-called Big Bang was just one such event among many that created other solar systems or parts of the universe; and that when the universe came into being with the spreading out of all the remnants of the explosion, a huge part of the material didn’t become planets, suns, stars, meteors etc. In this theory, some of the material is still so dense that it is not visible in the sense that Earth and other planets are, for example.
This means that some scientists accept the existence of a mass of material that exploded to form the universe with its many parts. But they add that major changes are still possible, with more “bangs” or the expansion of additional contracted material.
Experiments with equipment called particle accelerators and other scientific equipment attempt to recreate something like the conditions of the Big Bang. So far the experiments have been limited because of the small size. One commentator believes that it would take a particle accelerator the size of the universe itself to accurately create the right conditions.
On the opposite end of the scale, another scientist believes that a gram of matter is more than enough to create our universe. The right conditions could inflate this matter into the many parts of our universe we are familiar with. This theory uses some of the same thinking as the Big Bang, except that instead of an event untouched by human hands, this scientist thinks an intelligent being may have created the universe from a tiny particle of matter. This ties in with the idea above that it is up to us to create even more universes!
So far, the Big Bang theory is at the top of the list.
Category: Astronomy, Science
I have thought on many occasions that our universe is a result of an experiment made in the dimension up from us. If you take away the values of time and physical size, it is fairly easy to comprehend. Which as correctly quoted, we should be capable of creating a new universe with such tools as particle colliders.
What we need to make sure of though is that we have instruments that are strong enough to zoom in far enough and fast enough to be able to recognise the birth and many of it’s properties (i.e. planets, stars, galaxies etc..) of a new universe within it’s own dimension. Once we can do this and know it to be true, we can then make a judgment on whether our universe was made the same way, by a being or beings in the outer dimension with their own particle acceleration lab.
I can only guess that we will never be able to communicate with the beings from a dimension outside of ours… which then leaves the question of … where does the buck stop? Which outer dimensional universe came first and how did that one begin? It’s enough to make your head explode.
I also believe that dark matter is actually the spirit realm. We always associate death with the color black, which suggests to me that dark matter is a product of death but can and does get recycled back into matter/a living thing. Of course all of this still doesn’t answer the question of why?
I think we only find that out, when we die. I could possibly be wrong with all of this, but the reasoning of it makes sense to me. It’s just the original source of consciousness hurdle that baffles me.